Should I give Dawson's Creek a chance?
Oct. 27th, 2005 04:43 pmOr is it going to make my One Tree Hill watching seem pleasant in comparison? After all it does have Katie "Kidnapped by the cult" Holmes and James "oldest and baldest teen ever" Van Der Beek...
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 08:52 pm (UTC)It's kind of long winded though (lots of seasons). And it might be too soapy for your (most characters go through a bunch of couplings till they get paired with their one true love).
They did have some extremely good writing early on.
And Pacey strikes me as the Logan type in some of his actions.
Sadly, I didn't watch regularly enough to be able to give you any tips on which seasons are the most worthwhile ones.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:07 pm (UTC)Yeah, I was surprised the titular character of the show didn't get the girl...
most characters go through a bunch of couplings till they get paired with their one true love
That's a big negative, right there. You get one pass, one time. After that, choose! (I am going to scream if Veronica is going to keep going back and forth between Duncan and Logan). I mean, make up your freaking mind!
Pacey strikes me as the Logan type in some of his actions.
Heee. You know just what buttons to push :)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:11 pm (UTC)Yeah, I was surprised the titular character of the show didn't get the girl...
Well at least according to their fans it was because of the overwhelming power of their wazooo chemistry.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:15 pm (UTC)according to their fans it was because of the overwhelming power of their wazooo chemistry.
Heee. Chemistry will sell me on almost anything
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:10 pm (UTC)Also, I'd love to hear your take on it, so I am torn.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:54 pm (UTC)So I'm not sure that I'd recommend the show (especially since I HATE the titular character more than I've ever hated a fictional person in my life), but Pacey/Joey, second half of S3, might be worth the price of admission.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:09 pm (UTC)Dawson hate amuses me. Because J vdB is bizarre looking. I am shallow
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 11:23 pm (UTC)Josh Jackson, on the other hand...
Pacey is not gorgeous enough to compensate (maybe he's hot though?)
It sounds cliche, but it really is the personality that makes Pacey so attractive - although I find JJ gorgeous in his own way. I mean, just look at those eyes (http://www.creekdaze.com/caps/gallery/displayimage.php?album=23&pos=695). (That's S6 Pacey, but even in the earlier years he was a cutie (http://www.creekdaze.com/caps/gallery/displayimage.php?album=65&pos=401).)
But in the end I can't blame you for staying away. There's a lot about this show that drives me CRAZY.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:09 pm (UTC)But then again, you might not. The eps I've seen have been maddeningly typical, story-wise, for a teenish drama. BSG is not so formula, which is why I like it, it's all uncharted so it can surprise me. The teenish drama genre has been picked at and picked at, until you often have to get really super kinky to do anything new and fresh.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:38 pm (UTC)Does Katie Holmes have pupils anymore? In Batman Begins, she's like this soulless entity that bugs people to take action, while herself being this completely ineffectual pest.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:40 pm (UTC)First of all. DC, ridiculous as it sometimes is, is about a million times better than OTH. I'm still trying to figure out why I even watch OTH. Maybe I do it ironically. I definitely get some joy out of mocking it.
Also, Season 3 Pacey/Joey is the place to go.
I love Pacey Witter. As for the "not hotness" I can't even think that way since I love him as a character so much. And he's *so* Loganesque (who, as you know, I didn't initially find attractive) despite the fact that he's more wrong side of the tracks-ish than spoiled rich boy. Still - the snark, the funny, and the buried sweetness and vulnerability.
But I also can't entirely divide my Creek watching from the fact that I watched it communally with other silly college girls and it was fun. My second college roommate and I even became friends initially after shamefully admitting to our Creek watching.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:42 pm (UTC)They were a very popular couple after all.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:46 pm (UTC)It's funny. I thought long and hard before putting "Dawson's Creek" in as one of my interests. Because it's not something I would ever get involved in the fandom for.
But then I was like, "have no shame, if people don't like you for watching teh Creek then who needs 'em.
I still have some shame though. Especially now since we've never interacted before and now you're going to think of me as the DC girl forever more. :P
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-10-28 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-29 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-29 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-29 01:59 am (UTC)I have to admit that at first I didn't get what was so great about the show, but it grew on me. It had some great snark (Pacey especially rivals Logan there), but it was also a little manipulative and it pissed me off sometimes, and then there are a few times it made me cry (what can I say, I'm a sap :P). So just watch at your own risk, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-29 03:26 am (UTC)