Should I give Dawson's Creek a chance?
Oct. 27th, 2005 04:43 pmOr is it going to make my One Tree Hill watching seem pleasant in comparison? After all it does have Katie "Kidnapped by the cult" Holmes and James "oldest and baldest teen ever" Van Der Beek...
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 08:52 pm (UTC)It's kind of long winded though (lots of seasons). And it might be too soapy for your (most characters go through a bunch of couplings till they get paired with their one true love).
They did have some extremely good writing early on.
And Pacey strikes me as the Logan type in some of his actions.
Sadly, I didn't watch regularly enough to be able to give you any tips on which seasons are the most worthwhile ones.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:07 pm (UTC)Yeah, I was surprised the titular character of the show didn't get the girl...
most characters go through a bunch of couplings till they get paired with their one true love
That's a big negative, right there. You get one pass, one time. After that, choose! (I am going to scream if Veronica is going to keep going back and forth between Duncan and Logan). I mean, make up your freaking mind!
Pacey strikes me as the Logan type in some of his actions.
Heee. You know just what buttons to push :)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:10 pm (UTC)Also, I'd love to hear your take on it, so I am torn.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:11 pm (UTC)Yeah, I was surprised the titular character of the show didn't get the girl...
Well at least according to their fans it was because of the overwhelming power of their wazooo chemistry.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:15 pm (UTC)according to their fans it was because of the overwhelming power of their wazooo chemistry.
Heee. Chemistry will sell me on almost anything
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:20 pm (UTC)Or check out a few music vids deciding whether you like them or not.
Looks like they are trying out for the BA vibe:
For the record, they were another "I don't like them, but even I admit they had chemistry" type of couples. I really liked the scene where they go to a dance class together and the teacher tells them that they are obviously in love (they deny it naturally at this point) because only people who are hot for each other dance as badly together.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:25 pm (UTC)That means I've been in love with a huge number of people in my time :P
The pics are very cute, but he isn't. :sad: Also, not tall. Maybe he's got a sizzling personality? I didn't think Logan was hot either, so there's always hope...
I don't like them, but even I admit they had chemistry
If a couple has chemistry, I'll overlook most things.
Btw, have you ever watched Battlestar Galactica? We have such widely differing ship views, I am curious about your thoughts on the ships on that show...
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:31 pm (UTC)The pics are very cute, but he isn't. :sad: Also, not tall. Maybe he's got a sizzling personality? I didn't think Logan was hot either, so there's always hope...
Naw, he isn't cute at all (even though, everything better than the Beek), but I do remember him having charisma and acting abbility. Not enough to keep me drawn to the show, but he struck me as fairly good. Plus you know me, can't stand pure relationship based shows.
On Dawson's Creek I liked the coupling of Pacey with his earlier girlfriend Audrey. And I liked Jenn (who was always trying to be the moody/bitchy/slutty one) being romances by a babyfaced footballplayer whom she keeps rejecting because he is one year younger than her. That was a very sweet storyline from what I remember (they do get together eventually, don't know how it ended though, because I had stopped watching at that point).
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:50 pm (UTC)Btw, I saw some more Pacey pictures, and I am out. Yuck. Both he and Dawson are WASPily hideous. Meh.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:52 pm (UTC)Besides, chances are that it's probably pretty dated at this point anyway.
They had some extremely hysterical shipper wars though :D
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:53 pm (UTC)Yeah, nothing brings on them shipper wars the way triangles do. I am kinda surprised about the lack of shipper wars in Veronica Mars, so far.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:54 pm (UTC)So I'm not sure that I'd recommend the show (especially since I HATE the titular character more than I've ever hated a fictional person in my life), but Pacey/Joey, second half of S3, might be worth the price of admission.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 09:58 pm (UTC)I think the problem was the Joey and Dawson were like the intended childhood sweetheart couple. But then Joey/Pacey happened, had a lot of fans, lots of chemistry, people started pushing for it and in the end they (potentially) changed the originally changed the original end around so Joey and Pacey could end up together.
Of course, I was never truely part of the fandom (I'm just one of those schadenfreude onlooker when fandoms I don't care about duke it out), so I might be getting this all wrong.
Ever tried Dark Angel? Another scifi-ish show I could never really get into. And it's relatively short I think (only two or three seasons).
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:09 pm (UTC)But then again, you might not. The eps I've seen have been maddeningly typical, story-wise, for a teenish drama. BSG is not so formula, which is why I like it, it's all uncharted so it can surprise me. The teenish drama genre has been picked at and picked at, until you often have to get really super kinky to do anything new and fresh.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:09 pm (UTC)Dawson hate amuses me. Because J vdB is bizarre looking. I am shallow
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:10 pm (UTC)My other suggestions are still Lois&Clark (for campy fun) or La Femme Nikita (for lots of crazy angst).
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 10:10 pm (UTC)