dangermousie: (Tristan)
[personal profile] dangermousie
Saw the trailer for the Pride and Prejudice movie with Keira Knightley. Ugh. Ugh. UGH!

Not only is the overexposed KK way too modern and skinny to be Elizabeth (in Regency terms, she is a starvation victim), they have also switched the period to 1790s (!!!) and the way the movie makes it look, if I didn't know that this was Austen I would have thought it was a Bronte adaptation: full blown romanticism, crumbling buildings, wind and rain everywhere. Horrible. Don't even get me started on whoever is playing Darcy. If he is a dreamboat, I am a Chinese acrobat. Also, it looks as if they made Lizzy a modern woman. She was not.

More importantly, why? There was a perfect, popular and widely acclaimed adaptation in 1995. Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle were perfect for their roles, the script was accurate and literate. Ugh. Stop the madness, people!

Date: 2005-06-10 09:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meyerlemon.livejournal.com
I KNOW! I'm totally offended by it, and their Darcy is NOT Darcy-ish.

Date: 2005-06-10 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
The thing is, I don't know who they think their audience is going to be?

Period movies are a niche type of thing anyway, and there is no hot guy to draw women in or a hardcore fan group that would spread the word (most Austen nuts I know are displeased with this).

If they want to adopt a literary classic, there are plenty good and unadopted ones (I would love to see Burney's Cecilia on screen).

Profile

dangermousie: (Default)
dangermousie

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2 34 5 6 7 8
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 21st, 2026 02:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios