Oscar Noms
Jan. 31st, 2006 11:20 amOscar Noms are out and this is going to be the year where I am absolutely not interested. Seriously bored.
Their pic line up is just? Why should I care? The only movie on that list I liked a lot is Good Night and Good Luck. and it's hardly a movie to evoke strong reaction. None of the movies from my Top 10 made it on this list except for GNAGL. I haven't seen Munich and don't want to, I hated Crash as cliched, simplistic, preachy Oscarbation (hey, it worked!), I loathed Capote as a movie that just rubbed against the grain and Brokeback Mountain? I might get lynched by my flist but my main reaction was a meh-ish "OK."
How would I have been more interested in the ceremony (because Oscars' main concern is keeping me happy, of course): a nom History of Violence which was brilliant (and a nom for Viggo and Maria Bello for being brilliant in it), or for Ralph Fiennes who was the best thing about The Constant Gardener and tore my heart out, or any noms for The White Countess. A screenplay nom for Serenity, some kind of a nom for Rent, more for King Kong than vfx, Star Wars nom not just for make-up. Costumes for Kingdom of Heaven. Heck, why not go all out and nom Batman Begins for BP? As it is, *yawn*
I only have two strong reactions:
1. I can't believe Star Wars did not get nommed for effects. Argh. They had amazing, unbelievable effects. What do we get instead? Talking beavers of Narnia.
2. Howl's Moving Castle for best animation. It won't win it, as the award is Wallace and Gromit's to lose but it's the only movie from my Top 10 to end up with a major, Best Picture-like nom, so hey.
Their pic line up is just? Why should I care? The only movie on that list I liked a lot is Good Night and Good Luck. and it's hardly a movie to evoke strong reaction. None of the movies from my Top 10 made it on this list except for GNAGL. I haven't seen Munich and don't want to, I hated Crash as cliched, simplistic, preachy Oscarbation (hey, it worked!), I loathed Capote as a movie that just rubbed against the grain and Brokeback Mountain? I might get lynched by my flist but my main reaction was a meh-ish "OK."
How would I have been more interested in the ceremony (because Oscars' main concern is keeping me happy, of course): a nom History of Violence which was brilliant (and a nom for Viggo and Maria Bello for being brilliant in it), or for Ralph Fiennes who was the best thing about The Constant Gardener and tore my heart out, or any noms for The White Countess. A screenplay nom for Serenity, some kind of a nom for Rent, more for King Kong than vfx, Star Wars nom not just for make-up. Costumes for Kingdom of Heaven. Heck, why not go all out and nom Batman Begins for BP? As it is, *yawn*
I only have two strong reactions:
1. I can't believe Star Wars did not get nommed for effects. Argh. They had amazing, unbelievable effects. What do we get instead? Talking beavers of Narnia.
2. Howl's Moving Castle for best animation. It won't win it, as the award is Wallace and Gromit's to lose but it's the only movie from my Top 10 to end up with a major, Best Picture-like nom, so hey.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:31 pm (UTC)RotS - I don't give a damn what you think about the overall quality of the prequels, but there is absolutely no way RotS did not deserve an FX nod.
Like I said elsewhere, every time I think the Academy can't impress me less, they one-up themselves.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:54 pm (UTC)Ugh. Don't even get me started. It had incredible, incredible effects. That first battle alone was the best effects sequence with the possible exception of PJ stuff I've ever seen. Grrr.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:17 pm (UTC)I wonder if this bigger snub than usual is because of GL's "Screw the Critics" acceptance speech when RotS won at the PCA?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:57 pm (UTC)Could be, but it really should't matter. *bangs head against wall* It had such mind-blowing effects that...
*bangs head some more*
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 09:54 pm (UTC)Ah, but that would be giving the Academy credit for actually awarding stuff based on merit. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:39 pm (UTC)I think scifi in general is never taken seriously---why do you think people who praise BSG say, 'it's not scifi, it's drama!'...because they can't believe that scifi flicks can be ever worthy of anything beyond FX. Serenity will never be recognized as anything more than a story of a ship in space. If anything cerebral does come out of the scifi genre, the highest compliment people will pay to it is, "It's not *really* scifi 'cause it's good"
However, Health Ledger is very cute so I'm moderately happy that Pretty Boy gets more coverage! :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:55 pm (UTC)Heeee.
Personally, I think scifi is like any other genre. Has tons of horrible stuff but when it's good it should be recognized as such. World peace would be nice too :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:40 pm (UTC)Also, if you don't live near a large city, you're basically screwed with the best picture nominations. I don't think one of them has played near me yet.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:56 pm (UTC)Yeah, they are all indies. Seeing them isn't a problem for me (I live in a big big city) but not all indies=wow. Most of these are blah blah blaaaaah.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:16 pm (UTC)Star Wars getting shut out...someone just had it in for that franchise, because while I think King Kong beat it, it deserved a mention. I'm surprised Batman even got nominated for anything.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:56 pm (UTC)The Star Wars snub I just don't get.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:57 pm (UTC)I'm usually a big loather of stuff like this (*cough*Forrest Gump and Shine and Gladiator and 90% of hte Best Pic winners of hte last 20 years), but I *loved* Crash.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 11:26 pm (UTC)ROFL.
I think the movie would have been much better if it ended earlier, with Ennis finding the shirt. Oh well...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 02:10 am (UTC)