Un-be-fucking-lievable.
Dec. 19th, 2005 02:13 pmI don't usually post political stuff (read: never), but this has to be an exception. Got this from Yahoo.
The Fuck? When the hell is this moron getting out of office? Also, am I going to be investigated now, because I just called him a moron? Ugh.
I can't believe this. Welcome back to the Soviet Union.
WASHINGTON - President Bush, brushing aside bipartisan criticism in Congress, said Monday he approved spying on suspected terrorists without court orders because it was "a necessary part of my job to protect" Americans from attack.
The president said he would continue the program "for so long as the nation faces the continuing threat of an enemy that wants to kill American citizens," and added it included safeguards to protect civil liberties.
Bush bristled at a year-end news conference when asked whether there are any limits on presidential power in wartime.
"I just described limits on this particular program, and that's what's important for the American people to understand," Bush said.
Raising his voice, Bush challenged Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton — without naming them — to allow a final vote on legislation renewing the anti-terror Patriot Act. "I want senators from New York or Los Angeles or Las Vegas to go home and explain why these cities are safer" without the extension, he said.
Reid represents Nevada; Clinton is a New York senator, and both helped block passage of the legislation in the Senate last week.
"In a war on terror we cannot afford to be without this law for a single moment," Bush said.
Reid fired back quickly. "The president and the Republican leadership should stop playing politics with the Patriot Act," he said in a statement that added he and other Democrats favor a three-month extension of the expiring law to allow time for a long-term compromise.
The legislation has cleared the House but Senate Democrats have blocked final passage and its prospects are uncertain in the final days of the congressional session.
On another issue, Bush acknowledged that a pre-war failure of American intelligence — claiming that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction — has complicated the United States' ability to confront other potential emerging threats such as Iran.
"Where it is going to be most difficult to make the case is in the public arena," Bush said. "People will say, if we're trying to make the case on Iran, `Well, if the intelligence failed in Iraq, therefore, how can we trust the intelligence on Iran?'"
The news conference ran just shy of an hour. It was the latest in a series of events — appearances outside Washington, meetings with members of Congress and an Oval Office address on Sunday night — in which the president has sought to quell criticism of the war in Iraq and reverse his months-long slide in the polls.
In opening news conference remarks, Bush said the warrantless spying, conducted by the National Security Agency, was an essential element in the war on terror.
"It was a shameful act for someone to disclose this important program in a time of war. The fact that we're discussing this program is helping the enemy," he said.
On Capitol Hill, Democrats rejected Bush's rationale and said he had abused his authority.
"Where does he find in the Constitution the authority to tap the wires and the phones of American citizens without any court oversight?" said Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich.
Sen. Russ Feingold (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis., said, "We will not tolerate a president who believes that he is the sole decision-maker when it comes to the policies that this country should have in the war against terror and the policies we should have to protect the rights of completely innocent Americans."
"He is the president, not a king," Feingold said.
The existence of the program was disclosed last week, triggering an outpouring of criticism in Congress, but an unflinching defense from Bush and senior officials of his administration.
The president spoke not long after Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Congress had given Bush authority to spy on suspected terrorists in this country in legislation passed after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Bush and other officials have said the program involved monitoring phone calls and e-mails of individuals in this country believed to be plotting with terrorists overseas.
Normally, no wiretapping is permitted in the United States without a court warrant. But Bush said he approved the action without such orders "because it enables us to move faster and quicker. We've got to be fast on our feet.
"It is legal to do so. I swore to uphold the laws. Legal authority is derived from the Constitution," he added.
Domestic issues were scarcely mentioned during the news conference.
But at one point, Bush responded to criticism of his record on racial issues, exacerbated by the images of thousands of blacks stranded in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.
"One of the most hurtful things I can hear is, you know, Bush doesn't care about African-Americans," he said. "First of all, it's not true. And secondly, I am — I believe that — obviously, I've got to do a better job of communicating, I guess, to certain folks." He urged Congress to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act and promised to sign it.
The session was dominated by national security issues — principally the newly disclosed spying program by the NSA.
Bush emphasized that only international calls were monitored without court order — those placed from within the United States and going overseas, or those placed from other countries to individuals living in this country.
He stressed that calls placed and received within the United States would be monitored as has long been the case, after an order is granted by a secret court under the provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The Fuck? When the hell is this moron getting out of office? Also, am I going to be investigated now, because I just called him a moron? Ugh.
I can't believe this. Welcome back to the Soviet Union.
WASHINGTON - President Bush, brushing aside bipartisan criticism in Congress, said Monday he approved spying on suspected terrorists without court orders because it was "a necessary part of my job to protect" Americans from attack.
The president said he would continue the program "for so long as the nation faces the continuing threat of an enemy that wants to kill American citizens," and added it included safeguards to protect civil liberties.
Bush bristled at a year-end news conference when asked whether there are any limits on presidential power in wartime.
"I just described limits on this particular program, and that's what's important for the American people to understand," Bush said.
Raising his voice, Bush challenged Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton — without naming them — to allow a final vote on legislation renewing the anti-terror Patriot Act. "I want senators from New York or Los Angeles or Las Vegas to go home and explain why these cities are safer" without the extension, he said.
Reid represents Nevada; Clinton is a New York senator, and both helped block passage of the legislation in the Senate last week.
"In a war on terror we cannot afford to be without this law for a single moment," Bush said.
Reid fired back quickly. "The president and the Republican leadership should stop playing politics with the Patriot Act," he said in a statement that added he and other Democrats favor a three-month extension of the expiring law to allow time for a long-term compromise.
The legislation has cleared the House but Senate Democrats have blocked final passage and its prospects are uncertain in the final days of the congressional session.
On another issue, Bush acknowledged that a pre-war failure of American intelligence — claiming that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction — has complicated the United States' ability to confront other potential emerging threats such as Iran.
"Where it is going to be most difficult to make the case is in the public arena," Bush said. "People will say, if we're trying to make the case on Iran, `Well, if the intelligence failed in Iraq, therefore, how can we trust the intelligence on Iran?'"
The news conference ran just shy of an hour. It was the latest in a series of events — appearances outside Washington, meetings with members of Congress and an Oval Office address on Sunday night — in which the president has sought to quell criticism of the war in Iraq and reverse his months-long slide in the polls.
In opening news conference remarks, Bush said the warrantless spying, conducted by the National Security Agency, was an essential element in the war on terror.
"It was a shameful act for someone to disclose this important program in a time of war. The fact that we're discussing this program is helping the enemy," he said.
On Capitol Hill, Democrats rejected Bush's rationale and said he had abused his authority.
"Where does he find in the Constitution the authority to tap the wires and the phones of American citizens without any court oversight?" said Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich.
Sen. Russ Feingold (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis., said, "We will not tolerate a president who believes that he is the sole decision-maker when it comes to the policies that this country should have in the war against terror and the policies we should have to protect the rights of completely innocent Americans."
"He is the president, not a king," Feingold said.
The existence of the program was disclosed last week, triggering an outpouring of criticism in Congress, but an unflinching defense from Bush and senior officials of his administration.
The president spoke not long after Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Congress had given Bush authority to spy on suspected terrorists in this country in legislation passed after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Bush and other officials have said the program involved monitoring phone calls and e-mails of individuals in this country believed to be plotting with terrorists overseas.
Normally, no wiretapping is permitted in the United States without a court warrant. But Bush said he approved the action without such orders "because it enables us to move faster and quicker. We've got to be fast on our feet.
"It is legal to do so. I swore to uphold the laws. Legal authority is derived from the Constitution," he added.
Domestic issues were scarcely mentioned during the news conference.
But at one point, Bush responded to criticism of his record on racial issues, exacerbated by the images of thousands of blacks stranded in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.
"One of the most hurtful things I can hear is, you know, Bush doesn't care about African-Americans," he said. "First of all, it's not true. And secondly, I am — I believe that — obviously, I've got to do a better job of communicating, I guess, to certain folks." He urged Congress to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act and promised to sign it.
The session was dominated by national security issues — principally the newly disclosed spying program by the NSA.
Bush emphasized that only international calls were monitored without court order — those placed from within the United States and going overseas, or those placed from other countries to individuals living in this country.
He stressed that calls placed and received within the United States would be monitored as has long been the case, after an order is granted by a secret court under the provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 07:31 pm (UTC)If the asshole wants to listen in on my conversations, he's going to get nothing but a fat lot of whinging, so I'm not worried about being "implicated" in something.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 07:38 pm (UTC)The thing is, I am not even a Democrat. I've voted for Republicans before (though thankfully never Bush). But this guy just can't do a thing right. What is he, victim of faulty pre-programming?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 08:27 pm (UTC)sadamazing how often this thing is appropriate.I'm not strictly a Dem either, though that's how I'm registered - I'd have registered Independent if that didn't make your vote absolutely useless in Oklahoma (then again, voting anything but Republican here is tantamount to throwing your ballot in a shredder); both the D/R sides have things that irk me.
But as you said... I just don't know what the deal is with this guy. How the fuck did he get re-elected? I'm trying to think of a damn thing I thought he'd done right since shaking hands with victims at Ground Zero. (Well, I generally agree that Saddam needed to be gone, but how we went about doing it...) At first I thought he was just a pawn, but now I'm baffled.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 07:41 pm (UTC)Love the Mona Roslin icon.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 09:11 pm (UTC)Someday I'll get the hang of these tags without having to look them up. That will be the same day I figure out how to edit my comments on other people's journals :-/
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 07:44 pm (UTC)Now, I am merely a no-good, America-bashing, peacenik, godless, fag-loving Canadian socialist but how does swearing to defend the constitution authorize one to abrogate the constitutional protections against search and seizure and security of the person?
Just wondering....
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 08:00 pm (UTC)Exactly. I am so full of rage it's not even funny. And I *never* get into politics. Ugh.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 07:50 pm (UTC)I think someone needs to remind him of this. After that freaking address last night, I got up to see him AGAIN. I was shuffling through my house searching for a Diet Coke and wondering why I had to suffer through him on my TV twice within 24 hours.
I'm wondering when civil liberties became a joke in this country. And I'm wondering why the people of this country continue to let him chip away at their rights. The so called Patriot Act is destroying the basic foundation that this country was built on and it makes me very sad for our future.
The best part is, we wouldn't even know about this spying without someone leaking it to the press.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 07:59 pm (UTC)Exactly. Ugh.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 09:01 pm (UTC)I'm confused. I've known about this "spying program" (or at least part of it) within the Patriot Act since its inception. In fact, my entire A.P. American History class did. How is this new news to anyone? If a bunch of teenagers in a small town have heard about it, how did everyone else not?
Yes, it's a violation of constitutional rights and it is one of the reasons I did not vote for Bush, nor do I support him, but at this point very little can be done. The fact that the NSA, et. al are capable of doing this is no surprise. Even more, I sincerely doubt that they haven't been doing it for years, yet everyone is surprised by this?
Honestly, does no one care about what's going on in the country anymore? No wonder this administration can get away with so much bullshit.