Page Summary
life-on-queen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elvensapphire.livejournal.com - (no subject)
winterspel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ch1pper.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ayn-rand-fan-13.livejournal.com - (no subject)
crumpeteer.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shadowserenity.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cosmicviolet.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 08:19 pm (UTC)Oh, and hi from California!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 08:22 pm (UTC)Re: Duncan. I think maybe, if he wishes hard enough, he can become a real boy. Cause as for now, he's made of wood. Though I am finding him more interesting (if not more likeable) lately.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:02 pm (UTC)If you see WTL, I expect a full review! ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:04 pm (UTC)With Joaquin being all angsty? Trust me...
Which isn't stopping me from seeing it,
See, I spent 45 minutes ranting after PoA so it wasn't very enjoyable experience either for me or Mister. So why would I pay $$$ for this?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:06 pm (UTC)This is a little random, but did you like The Village ? I think Joaquin is splendid, even in his quietude, in that movie. It's a strange piece of film, but he and Bryce Dallas Howard were both good. I imagine he'll get an Oscar nod for WTL.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 08:58 pm (UTC)So yeah, I think I'll go back...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:12 pm (UTC)What?! Dark Angel's not about Logan's scruff?!!
Hmmmm, B5 S1 does have a lot of arc starting stuff but I think you could pick it up somehow. *cough*Lurkers Guide (http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/lurker.html)*cough* Plus Sheridan is way cooler than the wooden one.
ETA: I just read winterspel's comment. She is right as usual... Wait for the S1 so you can be all like "whoa, JMS is my Great Maker!"
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:18 pm (UTC)One of the rare occasions I wished this show had been on HBO :P
What?! Dark Angel's not about Logan's scruff?!!
Well, I was trying to be understanding of others' points of view ("trying" being the operative word, of course).
Love the icon!
I'll definitely check out Lurkers' Guide!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 10:47 pm (UTC)I cannot resist angsty!Logan. Plus his eyes prove the adage. Windows of the soul indeed.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 10:49 pm (UTC)Is it Wednesday yet?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 11:40 pm (UTC)and Yes, I was screaming over the L/V stuff. But in the preview, doesn't it feel like someone's fantasy? Logan restrained....
Must not obsess. Must not explode before Wed.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 11:42 pm (UTC)Yeah, and I even know whose fantasy.
mine mine mine mine mineI am a complete spoiler whore, but even if I wasn't, the UPN opening scene would have killed me dead but in a good way.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 11:44 pm (UTC)Remember Kindergarten, sharing is good.
yes, dead. is ded.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:27 pm (UTC)What?! Do you mean to tell me I've been right before? And no one told me? :P
*laughing*
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:38 pm (UTC)I'm seeing Harry Potter opening night. Oh, and my family saw P&P, and they all loved it. I stayed home, saying
"If it doesn't have Colin Firth in it, it obviously isn't worth my time".
"The photography was great!"
"Did the photoraphy have Colin Firth? No? Exactly."
"..."
Yes, my brain is dead. Why do you ask?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 09:50 pm (UTC)ROTFLOL
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 10:42 pm (UTC)Yeah, I'm totally not looking forward to this new P&P. Even tho I think Matthew McFayden is all kinds of hot on Spooks. I don't see him as Darcy. And Kiera Knightley? Buh?
BTW hilarious icon.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-17 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-18 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-18 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-18 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-18 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-18 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-18 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-18 05:01 am (UTC)Isn't that the point, though? :P I know I'd rather see a threesome that's mostly L/V (or maybe D/L, because I'm weird like that), than equally split.