Firefly ponderings
Aug. 3rd, 2005 11:53 amI was wondering who the "Independents" were. Could they have been the Outer planets who wanted freedom from the rigid and uncaring main worlds? That would explain how they lost, as their resources would be much worse, and also yet another reason why Mal likes the periphery. Is there any explanation about it that's non-spoilery?
ETA: I took a Firefly quiz. Results behind the cut.
I am Inara with a somewhat appropriate 69% :D That would explain the insane Mal-love, then.
ETA: I took a Firefly quiz. Results behind the cut.
I am Inara with a somewhat appropriate 69% :D That would explain the insane Mal-love, then.
![]() | You scored as Inara, the "Companion".
FiREFLY QUIZ created with QuizFarm.com |

no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:04 pm (UTC)My reading of the show was always that yes, the bulk of the Independent force was made up of people from borderworlds.
Basically, the way I thought of it was that the human race spread out across this galaxy or whatever over X amount of years, and then once people have settled in and have their worlds running however they deemed fit, the Anglo-Sino Alliance rose up and decided that everyone should be under their control. People who liked the way that they were living and didn't see the benefit of being ruled over by folks far off from them didn't appreciate that.
It's also mentioned by Mal that the Alliance had far superior numbers. So while it's always possible that there were a few people who weren't from borderworlds who might have been against unification too, it's not likely they were in any great number.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:12 pm (UTC)But also it could be that since the war is over, most people who weren't as hardcore idealist as Mal and Zoe just moved on and don't think about it much any more.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:21 pm (UTC)Of course, this is Whedon, so there's also the rather funky anime vibe to everything.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:28 pm (UTC)I adore The Searchers. One of the best movies out there, and I am not much of a Western fan.
The structure reminds me a bit of "Stagecoach" which basically takes Western cliches (only since it was made in 1939, they weren't cliches yet), stickes them in one stagecoach and sends them on a really close and dangerous journey where they interact.
You have the good outlaw (who is really a Mal character), you have the whore with the heart of gold, you have the good-hearted but really alcoholic doc, you have an aristocratic military wife, heavily pregnant, off to join her husband, you have the professional gambler who used to be a Southern gentleman, you have an absconding and moralistic banker, a timid whiskey salesman, a comic relief coach driver, and a steady elderly sheriff.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:49 pm (UTC)And then Whedon tries to dress it up as a "space western". He probably realizes that this has been done in the anime world with Cowboy Bebop, if the whole thing isn't a bit of a send up to that and westerns in general. Cowboy Bebop had the same basic pretense of ragtag crew of space cowboys (they even call Spike a cowboy on occassion even though he looks and acts nothing like one) that function as a screwed up family and whose main character had women issues.
The whole thing is rather genius if you think about it and it's a shame that Whedon had to cut the idea short, though it was probably the best thing that could happen to the series given Whedon's track record.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 05:18 pm (UTC)I wish the show could have run for two or so seasons. 14 eps is really too short. But certainly not more than that.
And yes, both I and Lord of Dangermousie (aka Husband) noticed that about the clothing. Mal's trousers have this stripe-thing that really makes them look like confederate-type pants. And yes on Simo's outfit. His little black glasses in the intro? Perfect.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 05:16 pm (UTC)Because I couldn't help but think of Stagecoach a bit, where everyone starts out as stereotypes and becomes a full-blown human by the end!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 05:06 pm (UTC)Bloodlines (http://www.livejournal.com/users/words_in_flight/859.html#cutid1)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 05:45 pm (UTC)First Mate Zoe
Simon, the Doctor
Captain Malcolm Reynolds
Jayne Cobb, resident bad-ass
Wash, the Pilot
Kaylee, the Mechanic
Inara, the "Companion"
RiVER
Shepherd Book
FiREFLY QUIZ
created with QuizFarm.com
What's this mean?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 06:49 pm (UTC)As a historical analogy, I've always thought of them more as survivors of a failed American Revolution. Colonists, sent out from the central worlds to seek a better life. Given nothing but a "newly terraformed planet with a cow and a handful of seed" (Mal puts it something like that). If they succeed, it's totally on their own effort; if they fail, no one from the central planets helped them or cared. So then the central government comes in with irrelevant laws, wanting tax money etc. So the upshot is a federation of independent worlds (or colonies, if you will) who don't necessarily want to form their own central govt, but want to be free of what they view as oppressive interference from the mother worlds.
My 2 cents ;->
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 06:54 pm (UTC)The American Rev. analogy is very viable, but it doesn't work as well for me. I do wonder about terraforming. Usually, it is a lot of effort to terraform, so it seems a bit odd (or most likely sloppy worldbuilding, which doesn't bother me) to go to all that effort and then just leave it for leasurly colonization instead of intensive use.
But that leads me to a related question, re: slavery. It exists out on the periphery but it seems to be a winked-at custom, not a legally accepted practice. I wonder if there is slavery in the Alliance.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 07:01 pm (UTC)But I freely admit that part of my reaction against the confederacy idea, is, like I said. There was nothing good there, and if I bought the analogy, I wouldn't be able to like Mal as much (for clinging to such a cause) and I'd wonder what Joss was trying to say by offering up such a romantic vision.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 07:08 pm (UTC)Well, I do think it's just an analogy, thus Josh took some tropes from it, but not lock stock and barrel. Just as in the Western, it's 1870s or so, thus the soldiers are Confederates (or Union soldiers) who have been displaced and have nowhere to go and no skill save fighting.
I guess if it makes it a more comfortable analogy, you can view Mal and Zoe as Union veterans, only they lost.
Mal clearly is not a classist or a slaver.
But I guess if I had an instinctive shuddery aversion to it, I couldn't like it either.