dangermousie: (Default)
[personal profile] dangermousie


WTF!

Is it run by the more hardline elements of Saudi Arabian conservatives?

Since when is a bit of a glimpse of a fully-clothed woman's shoulder, with a cut on it, is equivalent to hardcore porn or similar. WTF!

Date: 2008-10-15 02:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iheartpotatoes.livejournal.com
It DOES kind of look like a vagina! I wonder if they somehow mechanically weed out porn by blocking out anything that looks like it shares certain characteristics.

Date: 2008-10-15 02:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
LOL! It would have to be mechanical because if you look at the pic it's pretty clear what it is :)

Date: 2008-10-15 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkeyedwolf.livejournal.com
Photobucket pulled my Matsujun An-An pics. XD I think any bare skin sends up red flags.

Date: 2008-10-15 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
That's insane though! I saw those An-An pics, there wasn't any iffy bits in there: even a very puritan person would rate them PG-13 at most. And nobody in their right mind would rate a pic of a shoulder anything but G.

What on earth are their TOS?

Date: 2008-10-15 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkeyedwolf.livejournal.com
I'm just guessing, but I would suspect a ban on nudity of any kind (that they can catch). It's such a huge site, their workload would probably triple if they tried to review all questionable content on a case-by-case basis.

Date: 2008-10-15 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endlessdeep.livejournal.com
I made some icons of from famous paintings with nudity in them. Old paintings. The kind anyone can go to a museum to see. Photobucket removed them. *shakes head*

Date: 2008-10-15 03:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
That is completely insane!

Date: 2008-10-15 03:28 am (UTC)
morwen_peredhil: (angel facepalm - by pokecharm)
From: [personal profile] morwen_peredhil
What?

That is crazy.

Date: 2008-10-15 09:44 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-10-15 03:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelicus.livejournal.com
You know, at first glance and at the thumbnail...and if I don't stare too long...it could look dirty. *shrug* Maybe Photobucket has various pictures of vaginas stored in a program and if a picture pops up that matches any of them even vaguely, it gets pulled. They have to have some kind of automated program, right? There can't actually be that many people looking at every single picture that gets uploaded and deciding if it's decent or not?

Date: 2008-10-15 09:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
Really? I must be sheltered it never occurred to me. Photobucket is so odd :)

Date: 2008-10-15 03:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seven-trees.livejournal.com
Okay, I TOTALLY thought I was looking at something else for a second there.

Date: 2008-10-15 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seven-trees.livejournal.com
Absolutely. I even had to click on the image because I was like, why would dangermousie post a picture of a vagina? That seems extremely random.

Date: 2008-10-15 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kathputli-girl.livejournal.com
Haha, at first glance I thought it was some cleavage with something funky going on!
But that's kind of extream - they must not have actually looked at it closely.

Date: 2008-10-15 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
Especially since the original pic isn't the little thumbnail :)

Date: 2008-10-15 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexandral.livejournal.com
This is the most bizarre thing that I have seen violating PBucket's terms of service!!

Date: 2008-10-15 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
They must uphold morality somehow :)

Date: 2008-10-15 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hiiyaa.livejournal.com
Hahah, I guess we can conclude that they definitely don't check them manually, if we ever doubted it in the first place that is :D.

Date: 2008-10-15 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
Their automatic program is clearly a Victorian.

Date: 2008-10-15 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ulkis.livejournal.com
I was wondering what that picture could have been!

Maybe photobucket confused it for another body part somehow? Very weird.

Date: 2008-10-15 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
So very bizarre.

Date: 2008-10-15 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fenrir-khan.livejournal.com
OH! How dare you post these highly erotic pics of a... a... --I can barely bring myself to utter the word-- shoulder! This goes against every belief I've ever held dear: women of good standing and virtue DO NOT have shoulders (*shudder*). I'm now off to drape cloth around the backs of chairs for they remind me of this offending body part.

Seriously, I have since long given up on understanding the logic Photosucket relies on.

Date: 2008-10-15 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
I know, I should be ashamed of myself. What next, ankles! *gasp* Or even toes!

Date: 2008-10-18 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] animeshon.livejournal.com
photobucket should really look at some of the actual porn like photos on their site rather than pictures of shoulders. I was surprised at work once after searching photobucket, our internet security guy not impressed! Good thing he loves me and accepted that it was an accident.

Date: 2008-10-27 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
Seriously...so bizarre!

Profile

dangermousie: (Default)
dangermousie

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2 34 5 6 7 8
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 9th, 2026 12:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios